Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_meanplot.wasp
Title produced by softwareMean Plot
Date of computationThu, 30 Oct 2008 09:40:08 -0600
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Oct/30/t1225381281et20i8abal6z1qt.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 15:36:07 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20095, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 15:36:07 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact149
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F     [Mean Plot] [workshop 3] [2007-10-26 12:14:28] [e9ffc5de6f8a7be62f22b142b5b6b1a8]
F R PD    [Mean Plot] [task 4] [2008-10-30 15:40:08] [787873b6436f665b5b192a0bdb2e43c9] [Current]
F    D      [Mean Plot] [task 5: inflatie ...] [2008-10-30 18:18:37] [cb714085b233acee8e8acd879ea442b6]
F R PD        [Mean Plot] [WS3A T5 pt2] [2008-11-03 21:18:59] [2bdcdcd86f586cbd821f1fe8acabf575]
F R PD        [Mean Plot] [WS3A T5 pt1] [2008-11-03 21:21:33] [2bdcdcd86f586cbd821f1fe8acabf575]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-09 19:18:03 [Tamara Witters] [reply
Ik heb een foute oplossing gegeven.
Verbetering:
Dit is een duidelijk ander resultaat dan het oorspronkelijke resultaat!
We kunnen nu afleiden uit de notched box plots dat er geen seizoenaliteit meer is, vermits maand 7 duidelijk nog in het betrouwbaarheidsinterval van maand 6 valt, daardoor kunnen we besluiten dat er geen significant verschil is tussen maand 6 en 7 (alsook niet bij andere maanden).
2008-11-11 13:22:48 [256f97d8b7c07ed49f142eff724c6520] [reply
Door het gebruik van de 90% computatie, verdwijnen de outliers. Dit is dus een stabielere plot geworden.
2008-11-11 22:20:03 [df2ed12c9b09685cd516719b004050c5] [reply
Hier heeft een weglating van de 5% hoogste en 5% laagste intervallen wel een invloed gehad. Dit zien we bijvoorbeeld aan de mean plot. Deze vertoont nog stijgingen en dalingen, maar deze zijn niet meer zo scherp als voorheen en de uiterste waarden liggen uiteraard dichterbij het gemiddelde.

Post a new message
Dataseries X:
109.20
88.60
94.30
98.30
86.40
80.60
104.10
108.20
93.40
71.90
94.10
94.90
96.40
91.10
84.40
86.40
88.00
75.10
109.70
103.00
82.10
68.00
96.40
94.30
90.00
88.00
76.10
82.50
81.40
66.50
97.20
94.10
80.70
70.50
87.80
89.50
99.60
84.20
75.10
92.00
80.80
73.10
99.80
90.00
83.10
72.40
78.80
87.30
91.00
80.10
73.60
86.40
74.50
71.20
92.40
81.50
85.30
69.90
84.20
90.70
100.30




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 2 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20095&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]2 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20095&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20095&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135



Parameters (Session):
par1 = grey ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 12 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1 <- as.numeric(par1)
(n <- length(x))
(np <- floor(n / par1))
arr <- array(NA,dim=c(par1,np+1))
ari <- array(0,dim=par1)
j <- 0
for (i in 1:n)
{
j = j + 1
ari[j] = ari[j] + 1
arr[j,ari[j]] <- x[i]
if (j == par1) j = 0
}
ari
arr
arr.mean <- array(NA,dim=par1)
arr.median <- array(NA,dim=par1)
arr.midrange <- array(NA,dim=par1)
for (j in 1:par1)
{
arr.mean[j] <- mean(arr[j,],na.rm=TRUE)
arr.median[j] <- median(arr[j,],na.rm=TRUE)
arr.midrange[j] <- (quantile(arr[j,],0.75,na.rm=TRUE) + quantile(arr[j,],0.25,na.rm=TRUE)) / 2
}
overall.mean <- mean(x)
overall.median <- median(x)
overall.midrange <- (quantile(x,0.75) + quantile(x,0.25)) / 2
bitmap(file='plot1.png')
plot(arr.mean,type='b',ylab='mean',main='Mean Plot',xlab='Periodic Index')
mtext(paste('#blocks = ',np))
abline(overall.mean,0)
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot2.png')
plot(arr.median,type='b',ylab='median',main='Median Plot',xlab='Periodic Index')
mtext(paste('#blocks = ',np))
abline(overall.median,0)
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot3.png')
plot(arr.midrange,type='b',ylab='midrange',main='Midrange Plot',xlab='Periodic Index')
mtext(paste('#blocks = ',np))
abline(overall.midrange,0)
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot4.png')
z <- data.frame(t(arr))
names(z) <- c(1:par1)
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',xlab='Periodic Index',ylab='Value',main='Notched Box Plots - Periodic Subseries'))
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot5.png')
z <- data.frame(arr)
names(z) <- c(1:np)
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',xlab='Block Index',ylab='Value',main='Notched Box Plots - Sequential Blocks'))
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot6.png')
z <- data.frame(cbind(arr.mean,arr.median,arr.midrange))
names(z) <- list('mean','median','midrange')
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',ylab='Overall Central Tendency',main='Notched Box Plots'))
dev.off()