Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_tukeylambda.wasp
Title produced by softwareTukey lambda PPCC Plot
Date of computationSun, 26 Oct 2008 12:19:47 -0600
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Oct/26/t1225045262y12bc7ywwgx7wrz.htm/, Retrieved Tue, 28 May 2024 17:35:12 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=19005, Retrieved Tue, 28 May 2024 17:35:12 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact146
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F     [Tukey lambda PPCC Plot] [Investigating Dis...] [2007-10-21 16:01:20] [b9964c45117f7aac638ab9056d451faa]
F    D    [Tukey lambda PPCC Plot] [] [2008-10-26 18:19:47] [c0a347e3519123f7eef62b705326dad9] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-10-29 12:30:19 [Ken Van den Heuvel] [reply
Het antwoord is naar mijn mening correct. Toch wil ik er aan toevoegen dat de beste distributie niet altijd diegene zal zijn met de hoogste Tukey Lambda PPCC Plot waarde.
Wanneer bijvoorbeeld 2 distributiemodellen geschikt zijn voor een dataset maar de een vertoont toch een hogere waarde in de tabel, dan kan het toch interessanter zijn om het distributiemodel te kiezen met de lagere waarde omwille van de minder complexe aard van dit model.
Er kan ook een theoretische achtergrond zijn waarom een bepaalde distributie meer geschikt is dan een andere.
Soms is het zelfs niet van belang of het model optimaal gekozen is, maar dat het gewoon toepasbaar is op de dataset.
2008-11-03 17:38:22 [Jeroen Michel] [reply
Hier valt op te merken dat je wel degelijk de resultaten van de student van vorig jaar bevestigd. Alleen moet je er wel rekening mee houden dat je een conclusie maakt. Nu stel je de resultaten enkel vast. Probeer misschien ook eens na te denken waarom dit resultaat zo is? waarom dit wordt gebruikt? Vervolledig dit in je antwoord.

Zie ook de opmerking van de student hierboven!

Post a new message
Dataseries X:
110.40
96.40
101.90
106.20
81.00
94.70
101.00
109.40
102.30
90.70
96.20
96.10
106.00
103.10
102.00
104.70
86.00
92.10
106.90
112.60
101.70
92.00
97.40
97.00
105.40
102.70
98.10
104.50
87.40
89.90
109.80
111.70
98.60
96.90
95.10
97.00
112.70
102.90
97.40
111.40
87.40
96.80
114.10
110.30
103.90
101.60
94.60
95.90
104.70
102.80
98.10
113.90
80.90
95.70
113.20
105.90
108.80
102.30
99.00
100.70
115.50




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=19005&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=19005&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=19005&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135







Tukey Lambda - Key Values
Distribution (lambda)Correlation
Approx. Cauchy (lambda=-1)0.681034394717584
Exact Logistic (lambda=0)0.984820721672163
Approx. Normal (lambda=0.14)0.989505916159088
U-shaped (lambda=0.5)0.985385537255734
Exactly Uniform (lambda=1)0.97511352322751

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Tukey Lambda - Key Values \tabularnewline
Distribution (lambda) & Correlation \tabularnewline
Approx. Cauchy (lambda=-1) & 0.681034394717584 \tabularnewline
Exact Logistic (lambda=0) & 0.984820721672163 \tabularnewline
Approx. Normal (lambda=0.14) & 0.989505916159088 \tabularnewline
U-shaped (lambda=0.5) & 0.985385537255734 \tabularnewline
Exactly Uniform (lambda=1) & 0.97511352322751 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=19005&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Tukey Lambda - Key Values[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Distribution (lambda)[/C][C]Correlation[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Approx. Cauchy (lambda=-1)[/C][C]0.681034394717584[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Exact Logistic (lambda=0)[/C][C]0.984820721672163[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Approx. Normal (lambda=0.14)[/C][C]0.989505916159088[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]U-shaped (lambda=0.5)[/C][C]0.985385537255734[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Exactly Uniform (lambda=1)[/C][C]0.97511352322751[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=19005&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=19005&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Tukey Lambda - Key Values
Distribution (lambda)Correlation
Approx. Cauchy (lambda=-1)0.681034394717584
Exact Logistic (lambda=0)0.984820721672163
Approx. Normal (lambda=0.14)0.989505916159088
U-shaped (lambda=0.5)0.985385537255734
Exactly Uniform (lambda=1)0.97511352322751



Parameters (Session):
Parameters (R input):
R code (references can be found in the software module):
gp <- function(lambda, p)
{
(p^lambda-(1-p)^lambda)/lambda
}
sortx <- sort(x)
c <- array(NA,dim=c(201))
for (i in 1:201)
{
if (i != 101) c[i] <- cor(gp(ppoints(x), lambda=(i-101)/100),sortx)
}
bitmap(file='test1.png')
plot((-100:100)/100,c[1:201],xlab='lambda',ylab='correlation',main='PPCC Plot - Tukey lambda')
grid()
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Tukey Lambda - Key Values',2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Distribution (lambda)',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Correlation',1,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Approx. Cauchy (lambda=-1)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c[1])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Exact Logistic (lambda=0)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,(c[100]+c[102])/2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Approx. Normal (lambda=0.14)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c[115])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'U-shaped (lambda=0.5)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c[151])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Exactly Uniform (lambda=1)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c[201])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')