Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean4.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Mean with known Variance - Sample Size
Date of computationFri, 14 Nov 2008 00:38:03 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/14/t12266483202l5kakv4ffq3soj.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 12:02:42 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24908, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 12:02:42 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact197
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
-     [Testing Mean with known Variance - Sample Size] [pork quality test] [2008-11-12 10:56:31] [1b742211e88d1643c42c5773474321b2]
F   P   [Testing Mean with known Variance - Sample Size] [kelly] [2008-11-13 08:17:00] [1b742211e88d1643c42c5773474321b2]
F           [Testing Mean with known Variance - Sample Size] [lennart] [2008-11-14 07:38:03] [2c8d42633e361f417e2deeaad9755857] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-17 10:15:03 [Katrijn Truyman] [reply
Om de pakkans te vergroten tot 95% en de variantie te verkleinen, moet de steekproefgrootte aanzienlijk vergroot worden. (de huideige pakkans bedraagt slechts 6%)
De berekeningen tonen aan dat hiervoor een steekproefgrootte van 32466 nodig is, maar in de praktijk is dit duur en omslachtig. Dit is dus niet realistisch.
2008-11-17 16:05:49 [Hundra Smet] [reply
juiste berekening en conclusie. alleen iets vergeten zeggen over de variantie.

we willen type 1 en 2 fout laten dalen (pakkans vergroten). dit doen we door de steekproef te vergroten, waardoor de variantie daalt. we zien in de berekening dat we de steekproef moeten verhogen naar 32 466,5. dit kost echter veel tijd en geld en is bijgevolg niet haalbaar.
2008-11-22 15:37:55 [Thomas Plasschaert] [reply
goede berekeningen en conclusie, de steekproefgrootte moet inderdaad tot meer dan 32000 waarnemingen opgetrokken worden, wat zeer duur en omslachtig is

Post a new message




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 2 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24908&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]2 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24908&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24908&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135







Testing Mean with known Variance
population variance0.012
null hypothesis about mean0.15
alternative hypothesis about mean0.152
type I error0.05
type II error0.05
sample size32466.5214491449

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
null hypothesis about mean & 0.15 \tabularnewline
alternative hypothesis about mean & 0.152 \tabularnewline
type I error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
type II error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
sample size & 32466.5214491449 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24908&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]null hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.15[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]alternative hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.152[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type I error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type II error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample size[/C][C]32466.5214491449[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24908&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24908&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Mean with known Variance
population variance0.012
null hypothesis about mean0.15
alternative hypothesis about mean0.152
type I error0.05
type II error0.05
sample size32466.5214491449



Parameters (Session):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 0.15 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.05 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 0.15 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.05 ; par5 = 0.05 ; par6 = ; par7 = ; par8 = ; par9 = ; par10 = ; par11 = ; par12 = ; par13 = ; par14 = ; par15 = ; par16 = ; par17 = ; par18 = ; par19 = ; par20 = ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
par5<-as.numeric(par5)
c <- 'NA'
csn <- abs(qnorm(par5))
if (par2 == par3)
{
conclusion <- 'Error: the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis must not be equal.'
}
ua <- abs(qnorm(par4))
ub <- qnorm(par5)
c <- (par2+ua/ub*(-par3))/(1-(ua/ub))
sqrtn <- ua*sqrt(par1)/(c - par2)
samplesize <- sqrtn * sqrtn
ua
ub
c
sqrtn
samplesize
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'null hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'alternative hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type I error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type II error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par5)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#ex4','sample size','example'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,samplesize)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')