Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean4.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Mean with known Variance - Sample Size
Date of computationFri, 14 Nov 2008 00:35:47 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/14/t12266481761k3lbyq4z81640d.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 10:47:45 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24905, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 10:47:45 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact220
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
-     [Testing Mean with known Variance - Sample Size] [pork quality test] [2008-11-12 10:56:31] [1b742211e88d1643c42c5773474321b2]
F   P   [Testing Mean with known Variance - Sample Size] [kelly] [2008-11-13 08:17:00] [1b742211e88d1643c42c5773474321b2]
F           [Testing Mean with known Variance - Sample Size] [jules] [2008-11-14 07:35:47] [52492148dbcac26917ed19e489351f79] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-16 11:49:51 [Jasmine Hendrikx] [reply
Evaluatie Q4:

De juiste berekening is gemaakt. We moeten inderdaad de sample size vinden. Zoals de student juist concludeert, gaan we type 2 error verkleinen. Aanvullend zou hierbij nog vermeld kunnen worden dat we de proef dus nauwkeuriger willen maken door de variantie te verkleinen. Hierdoor maken we de normaalverdeling smaller. Zoals de student correct opmerkt, moet de steekproefgrootte daardoor vergroot worden tot 32466,52 en hierdoor treden er hier veel problemen op. De steekproef is namelijk te groot, te omslachtig, te veel werk en te duur. Zoals de student al vermeldde, is het dus praktisch niet haalbaar.
2008-11-24 12:17:05 [94a54c888ac7f7d6874c3108eb0e1808] [reply
De bereking is correct. We moeten naar een sample size zoeken. De conclusies van de student zijn juist. We kunnen de waarden nauwkeuriger maken door de variantie te verkleinen met het gevolg dat de normaalverdeling smaller wordt. Zoals de student al vermeldde, is het praktisch niet haalbaar.

Post a new message




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24905&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24905&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24905&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135







Testing Mean with known Variance
population variance0.012
null hypothesis about mean0.15
alternative hypothesis about mean0.152
type I error0.05
type II error0.05
sample size32466.5214491449

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
null hypothesis about mean & 0.15 \tabularnewline
alternative hypothesis about mean & 0.152 \tabularnewline
type I error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
type II error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
sample size & 32466.5214491449 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24905&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]null hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.15[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]alternative hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.152[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type I error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type II error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample size[/C][C]32466.5214491449[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24905&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24905&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Mean with known Variance
population variance0.012
null hypothesis about mean0.15
alternative hypothesis about mean0.152
type I error0.05
type II error0.05
sample size32466.5214491449



Parameters (Session):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 0.15 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.05 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 0.15 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.05 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
par5<-as.numeric(par5)
c <- 'NA'
csn <- abs(qnorm(par5))
if (par2 == par3)
{
conclusion <- 'Error: the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis must not be equal.'
}
ua <- abs(qnorm(par4))
ub <- qnorm(par5)
c <- (par2+ua/ub*(-par3))/(1-(ua/ub))
sqrtn <- ua*sqrt(par1)/(c - par2)
samplesize <- sqrtn * sqrtn
ua
ub
c
sqrtn
samplesize
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'null hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'alternative hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type I error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type II error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par5)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#ex4','sample size','example'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,samplesize)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')