Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean6.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Sample Mean with known Variance - Confidence Interval
Date of computationWed, 12 Nov 2008 09:21:22 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/12/t1226506935vnlhzpsrdpbfxy1.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 12:36:21 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24273, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 12:36:21 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact161
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Testing Sample Mean with known Variance - Confidence Interval] [Bert Moons - Case...] [2008-11-12 16:21:22] [1828943283e41f5e3270e2e73d6433b4] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-15 18:22:52 [Charis Berrevoets] [reply
Je berekening is correct. Je vermeld ook dat, na het veranderen van de nulhypothese, het steekproefgemiddelde nog steeds binnen het 95%-betrouwbaarheidsinterval ligt.
Je besluit hier echter uit dat wat de ex-werknemer zegt (15,2% vetpercentage) niet kan. Dit is niet waar. Het bewijst juist, dat zelfs wanneer de leverancier het verpercentage opdrijft tot 15,2% het gemeten percentage van 15,46% nog steeds binnen het interval ligt en dus niet op toeval berust. Daar een variatie van 1,2% toegestaan is, duiden deze resultaten helemaal niet op fraude want fraude van 0,2% vinden we hier niet. We kunnen de theorie van de ex-werknemer dus niet verwerpen. Hij wordt eerder geloofwaardiger, want we kunnen de nulhypothese (van 15,2%) niet verwerpen.
2008-11-23 15:24:15 [Gilliam Schoorel] [reply
Als we ervan uitgaan dat het vetpercentage 15.2 % bedraagt (=nulhypothese) dan krijgen we voor het betrouwbaarheidsinterval 18.66%. Dit is nog steeds groter dan 15.46% na het veranderen van de nulhypothese. Dus kunnen we weer concluderen dat er geen fraude gepleegd wordt. De claim van de ex-werknemer kan men dus niet verwerpen.
2008-11-24 18:47:20 [Angelique Van de Vijver] [reply
goede berekening maar hier moeten we weer naar het rechts-eenzijdige betrouwbaarheidsinterval kijken wat de student niet heeft gedaan. Het steekproegemiddelde ligt nog altijd binnen het betrouwbaarheidsinterval wat er dus op wijst dat we geen klacht moeten indienen. Dit is dus een foute conclusie van de student.

Post a new message




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time0 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 0 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24273&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]0 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24273&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24273&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time0 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132







Testing Sample Mean with known Variance
Population variance0.012
Sample size27
Null hypothesis (H0)0.152
Confidence interval0.95
Type of IntervalLeft tailRight tail
Two-sided confidence interval at 0.950.1106803311796960.193319668820304
Left one-sided confidence interval at 0.950.117323440808296+inf
Right one-sided confidence interval at 0.95-inf0.186676559191704
more information about confidence interval

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Sample Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
Population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
Sample size & 27 \tabularnewline
Null hypothesis (H0) & 0.152 \tabularnewline
Confidence interval & 0.95 \tabularnewline
Type of Interval & Left tail & Right tail \tabularnewline
Two-sided confidence interval at  0.95 & 0.110680331179696 & 0.193319668820304 \tabularnewline
Left one-sided confidence interval at  0.95 & 0.117323440808296 & +inf \tabularnewline
Right one-sided confidence interval at  0.95 & -inf & 0.186676559191704 \tabularnewline
more information about confidence interval \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24273&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Sample Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Sample size[/C][C]27[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Null hypothesis (H0)[/C][C]0.152[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Confidence interval[/C][C]0.95[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Type of Interval[/C][C]Left tail[/C][C]Right tail[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Two-sided confidence interval at  0.95[/C][C]0.110680331179696[/C][C]0.193319668820304[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Left one-sided confidence interval at  0.95[/C][C]0.117323440808296[/C][C]+inf[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Right one-sided confidence interval at  0.95[/C][C]-inf[/C][C]0.186676559191704[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]more information about confidence interval[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24273&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24273&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Sample Mean with known Variance
Population variance0.012
Sample size27
Null hypothesis (H0)0.152
Confidence interval0.95
Type of IntervalLeft tailRight tail
Two-sided confidence interval at 0.950.1106803311796960.193319668820304
Left one-sided confidence interval at 0.950.117323440808296+inf
Right one-sided confidence interval at 0.95-inf0.186676559191704
more information about confidence interval



Parameters (Session):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 27 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.95 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 27 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.95 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
sigma <- sqrt(par1)
sqrtn <- sqrt(par2)
ua <- par3 - abs(qnorm((1-par4)/2))* sigma / sqrtn
ub <- par3 + abs(qnorm((1-par4)/2))* sigma / sqrtn
ua
ub
ul <- par3 - qnorm(par4) * sigma / sqrtn
ul
ur <- par3 + qnorm(par4) * sigma / sqrtn
ur
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Sample Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Sample size',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Null hypothesis (H0)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Confidence interval',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Type of Interval',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Left tail',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Right tail',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,paste('Two-sided confidence interval at ',par4), header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,ua)
a<-table.element(a,ub)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,paste('Left one-sided confidence interval at ',par4), header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,ul)
a<-table.element(a,'+inf')
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,paste('Right one-sided confidence interval at ',par4), header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'-inf')
a<-table.element(a,ur)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a, hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#ex6', 'more information about confidence interval','example'),3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')