FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean1.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Mean with known Variance - Critical Value
Date of computationWed, 12 Nov 2008 03:13:51 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/12/t1226485080v6zf4iu23gkfneq.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 11:36:22 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24048, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 11:36:22 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact241

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Testing Mean with known Variance - Critical Value] [pork quality test q1] [2008-11-12 10:13:51] [607bd9e9685911f7e343f7bc0bf7bdf9] [Current]
F         [Testing Mean with known Variance - Critical Value] [pork quality test q1] [2008-11-14 07:28:29] [17bd4671b42d569d890f7246b2ee4ecc]
F         [Testing Mean with known Variance - Critical Value] [pork quality test q1] [2008-11-14 07:27:49] [28127c682c8fb75d2e35a9fb597d962b]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-16 13:47:41 [Julie Govaerts] [reply] 
dit is een tweezijdig probleem = ofwel wordt er vlees geleverd met teveel vet = slechte kwaliteit, ofwel met te weinig vet = geen smaak

het vetpercentage moet dus tussen 2 grenzen liggen = interval
als het vetpercentage hiertussen ligt = geen klacht indienen

1 sided zou ook gekund hebben mits goede argumentatie = ontbrak!
= alleen dan kan de leverancier er economisch voordeel uit halen = te veel vet = kost hem minder dus enkel dit doen (meer vet dan vlees)

De afwijking is toe te schrijven aan het toeval. De leverancier produceert naar alle waarschijnlijkheid aan een vetgehalte van 15%.

2008-11-22 10:15:20 [Roel Geudens] [reply] 
Je oet hier idd best een two-sided test gebruiken. De student geeft ook geen juiste verklaring voor het gebruik van de one-sided test. De output op zich is wel correct.
2008-11-23 16:23:58 [Gilliam Schoorel] [reply] 
Conclusie is goed. Je kan hier een two-sided test voor gebruiken maar een one-sided test is ook perfect mogelijk omdat er enkel getest moet worden of het vetgehalte hoger of lager ligt dan de vooropgestelde. De leverancier kan enkel frauderen door meer vet toe te voegen dan afgesproken. Als de leverancier te weinig vet zou toevoegen zou hij enkel zichzelf benadelen.
Het verschil tussen de sample mean en de kritieke waarde is niet groot genoeg is om van fraude te kunnen spreken.

Er moet dus geen klacht worden ingediend omdat men zich heeft gehouden aan de waarden die vooraf werden afgesproken.
2008-11-24 10:28:30 [Alexander Hendrickx] [reply] 
De opdracht werd goed uitgevloerd er werd echter geen reden gegeven voor het gebruik van de one sided test. De 2 sided test was ook correct geweest, dan zoeken we twee grenzen waar het vetpercentage tussen zou moeten liggen. Het verschil tussen sample mean en kritieke waarde is te klein om van fraude te spreken.

Post a new message

Dataset

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time0 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 0 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24048&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]0 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24048&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24048&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time0 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135






Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance0.012
sample mean0.1546
null hypothesis about mean0.15
type I error0.05
critical value (one-tailed)0.184676559191704
confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean)[ 0.113280331179696 , 0.195919668820304 ]
conclusion for one-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion for two-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
sample size & 27 \tabularnewline
population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
sample mean & 0.1546 \tabularnewline
null hypothesis about mean & 0.15 \tabularnewline
type I error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
critical value (one-tailed) & 0.184676559191704 \tabularnewline
confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean) & [ 0.113280331179696 ,  0.195919668820304 ] \tabularnewline
conclusion for one-tailed test \tabularnewline
Do not reject the null hypothesis. \tabularnewline
conclusion for two-tailed test \tabularnewline
Do not reject the null hypothesis \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24048&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample size[/C][C]27[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample mean[/C][C]0.1546[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]null hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.15[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type I error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]critical value (one-tailed)[/C][C]0.184676559191704[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean)[/C][C][ 0.113280331179696 ,  0.195919668820304 ][/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]conclusion for one-tailed test[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Do not reject the null hypothesis.[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]conclusion for two-tailed test[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Do not reject the null hypothesis[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24048&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24048&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance0.012
sample mean0.1546
null hypothesis about mean0.15
type I error0.05
critical value (one-tailed)0.184676559191704
confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean)[ 0.113280331179696 , 0.195919668820304 ]
conclusion for one-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion for two-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 0.012 ; par3 = 0.1546 ; par4 = 0.15 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 0.012 ; par3 = 0.1546 ; par4 = 0.15 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
par5<-as.numeric(par5)
c <- 'NA'
csn <- abs(qnorm(par5))
csn2 <- abs(qnorm(par5/2))
if (par3 == par4)
{
conclusion <- 'Error: the null hypothesis and sample mean must not be equal.'
conclusion2 <- conclusion
} else {
cleft <- par3 - csn2 * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
cright <- par3 + csn2 * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
c2 <- paste('[',cleft)
c2 <- paste(c2,', ')
c2 <- paste(c2,cright)
c2 <- paste(c2,']')
if ((par4 < cleft) | (par4 > cright))
{
conclusion2 <- 'Reject the null hypothesis'
} else {
conclusion2 <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis'
}
}
if (par3 > par4)
{
c <- par4 + csn * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
if (par3 < c)
{
conclusion <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis.'
} else {
conclusion <- 'Reject the null hypothesis.'
}
}
if (par3 < par4)
{
c <- par4 - csn * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
if (par3 > c)
{
conclusion <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis.'
} else {
conclusion <- 'Reject the null hypothesis.'
}
}
c
conclusion
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample size',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'null hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type I error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par5)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#overview','critical value (one-tailed)','about the critical value'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'confidence interval (two-tailed)
(sample mean)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'conclusion for one-tailed test',2,header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,conclusion,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'conclusion for two-tailed test',2,header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,conclusion2,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')