FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean1.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Mean with known Variance - Critical Value
Date of computationWed, 12 Nov 2008 02:22:36 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/12/t1226481786nogl2v7g7txxjji.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 10:43:04 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24026, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 10:43:04 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact238

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Testing Mean with known Variance - Critical Value] [Q1 porktesting] [2008-11-12 09:22:36] [b09437381d488816ab9f5cf07e347c02] [Current]
F         [Testing Mean with known Variance - Critical Value] [the pork quality ...] [2008-11-12 09:59:59] [975daa21de49eaf4d491226310243f5a]
F RM      [Testing Mean with known Variance - p-value] [the pork quality ...] [2008-11-12 10:14:53] [975daa21de49eaf4d491226310243f5a]
F RMP     [Testing Mean with known Variance - Type II Error] [the pork quality ...] [2008-11-12 10:29:17] [975daa21de49eaf4d491226310243f5a]
F RMP     [Testing Mean with known Variance - Sample Size] [the pork quality ...] [2008-11-12 10:42:20] [975daa21de49eaf4d491226310243f5a]
F RMP     [Testing Sample Mean with known Variance - Confidence Interval] [the pork quality ...] [2008-11-12 10:53:48] [975daa21de49eaf4d491226310243f5a]
F RMP     [Testing Sample Mean with known Variance - Confidence Interval] [the pork quality ...] [2008-11-12 11:09:17] [975daa21de49eaf4d491226310243f5a]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-19 16:24:26 [Ken Wright] [reply] 
ik heb hier een gedeeltelijk juist besluit gevormd. Ik heb hier de one sided test gebruikt, maar hier moest dan nog bij geargumenteerd worden dat enkel met hoge vetwaarden de leverancier een economisch voordeel kan halen. de nulhyphotese moet niet worden verworden omdat 0.15 lager als de critical value ligt van 0.18..
2008-11-23 16:43:04 [Aurélie Van Impe] [reply] 
Je kiest voor een one-tailed test, omdat je enkel naar de rechtse extreme waarden moet kijken, maar je had hier beter nog het argument bijgegeven dat je dit doet, omdat de worstendraaier enkel voordeel haalt uit het gebruiken van teveel vet. Je zegt dat de nulhypothese niet verworpen moet worden, maar je legt niet uit waarom. Je had kunnen zeggen dat de sample mean lager ligt dan de kritische waarde, wat erop duidt dat de afwijking van het contractueel toegelaten vetpercentage slechts toevallig is. We kunnen dus geen klacht indienen.
2008-11-23 18:12:57 [c97d2ae59c98cf77a04815c1edffab5a] [reply] 
het feit dat de 0-hypotheses niet moet verworpen worden is juist. je kan gebruik maken van de 1-tailed test, maar je kon ook gebruik maken van de 2-tailed test, omdat de levering van vlees kan afwijken in 2 richtingen.
- Te weinig vet: de smaak gaat erop achteruit
- Te veel vet: de kwaliteit gaat erop achteruit.

Het steekproef gemiddelde (15,46%) ligt hierbij binnen het betrouwbaarheidsinterval (11%-19%), en overschrijdt de kritische waarde niet. We en hebben dus geen reden tot ongerustheid. De afwijking van het steekproefgemiddelde t.ov. de nulhypothese is dus te wijten aan toeval, waardoor de nulhypothese niet verworpen moet worden.
2008-11-24 17:22:42 [Ellen Van den Broeck] [reply] 
Normaal zou ik hier opteren voor een two-tailed test. Maar ik vind een one-tailed test ook oké als we rekening houden met het argument van de student.
De critical value is groter als de sample mean wat wil zeggen dat de afwijking toevallig is en we inderdaad de nulhypothese niet moeten verwerpen.

Post a new message

Dataset

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time0 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 0 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24026&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]0 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24026&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24026&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time0 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135






Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance0.012
sample mean0.1546
null hypothesis about mean0.15
type I error0.05
critical value (one-tailed)0.184676559191704
confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean)[ 0.113280331179696 , 0.195919668820304 ]
conclusion for one-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion for two-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
sample size & 27 \tabularnewline
population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
sample mean & 0.1546 \tabularnewline
null hypothesis about mean & 0.15 \tabularnewline
type I error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
critical value (one-tailed) & 0.184676559191704 \tabularnewline
confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean) & [ 0.113280331179696 ,  0.195919668820304 ] \tabularnewline
conclusion for one-tailed test \tabularnewline
Do not reject the null hypothesis. \tabularnewline
conclusion for two-tailed test \tabularnewline
Do not reject the null hypothesis \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24026&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample size[/C][C]27[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample mean[/C][C]0.1546[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]null hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.15[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type I error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]critical value (one-tailed)[/C][C]0.184676559191704[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean)[/C][C][ 0.113280331179696 ,  0.195919668820304 ][/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]conclusion for one-tailed test[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Do not reject the null hypothesis.[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]conclusion for two-tailed test[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Do not reject the null hypothesis[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24026&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24026&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance0.012
sample mean0.1546
null hypothesis about mean0.15
type I error0.05
critical value (one-tailed)0.184676559191704
confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean)[ 0.113280331179696 , 0.195919668820304 ]
conclusion for one-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion for two-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 0.012 ; par3 = 0.1546 ; par4 = 0.15 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 0.012 ; par3 = 0.1546 ; par4 = 0.15 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
par5<-as.numeric(par5)
c <- 'NA'
csn <- abs(qnorm(par5))
csn2 <- abs(qnorm(par5/2))
if (par3 == par4)
{
conclusion <- 'Error: the null hypothesis and sample mean must not be equal.'
conclusion2 <- conclusion
} else {
cleft <- par3 - csn2 * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
cright <- par3 + csn2 * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
c2 <- paste('[',cleft)
c2 <- paste(c2,', ')
c2 <- paste(c2,cright)
c2 <- paste(c2,']')
if ((par4 < cleft) | (par4 > cright))
{
conclusion2 <- 'Reject the null hypothesis'
} else {
conclusion2 <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis'
}
}
if (par3 > par4)
{
c <- par4 + csn * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
if (par3 < c)
{
conclusion <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis.'
} else {
conclusion <- 'Reject the null hypothesis.'
}
}
if (par3 < par4)
{
c <- par4 - csn * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
if (par3 > c)
{
conclusion <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis.'
} else {
conclusion <- 'Reject the null hypothesis.'
}
}
c
conclusion
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample size',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'null hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type I error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par5)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#overview','critical value (one-tailed)','about the critical value'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'confidence interval (two-tailed)
(sample mean)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'conclusion for one-tailed test',2,header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,conclusion,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'conclusion for two-tailed test',2,header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,conclusion2,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')