FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean6.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Sample Mean with known Variance - Confidence Interval
Date of computationTue, 11 Nov 2008 08:17:39 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/11/t122641669655f1wmgxltxyn50.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 09:21:57 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23583, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 09:21:57 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact125

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Testing Sample Mean with known Variance - Confidence Interval] [Sample mean 0.152] [2008-11-11 15:17:39] [21d7d81e7693ad6dde5aadefb1046611] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-21 16:02:36 [90714a39acc78a7b2ecd294ecc6b2864] [reply] 
Hier gebruik je ook de one-sided confidence interval van de right-tail, om dezelfde reden als in Q5. Enkel de afwijking van het vetpercentage naar boven toe een economisch voordeel voor de producent kan betekenen. De rechter staart is nauwkeuriger, omdat de volledige 5% (foutmarge) toegewezen wordt aan de rechterkant. Bij de two-sided wordt de 5% verdeeld over de linkse en rechtse tail, wat maakt dat de resultaten voor de two-sided extremer zijn.
2008-11-23 10:44:50 [Jeroen Michel] [reply] 
Hier is je berekening juist, alleen moet je er hier voor zorgen dat je argumentatie nog iets uitgebreider is.

Hier gebruiken we dezelfde methode als in Q5. Hiervoor worden ook dezelfde redenen opgegeven als in Q5.

Ook al wordt hier uitgegaan van een nulhypothese van 15.2% i.p.v. 15%, dan nog ligt het gemiddelde van de steekproef 0.1546 lager dan 0.189276559191704 en dus binnen het 95%-betrouwbaarheidsinterval.
2008-11-24 19:49:58 [Ellen Van Ham] [reply] 
Hier maken we gebruik van volgende methode: Testing Sample Mean with known Variance – Confidence Interval.
We kiezen hier ook weer voor het right-sided confidence interval, omdat het gaat om het niet overschrijden van een bepaald vetgehalte. Dit bedraagt 18,67% bij een vetpercentage van 15,2%. De producent is schuldig aan fraude (nog meer dan dat de WN aanvankelijk meldde). Het verschil tussen deze twee percentages bedraagt slechts 0,26%. De percentages zijn dus consistent. Indien er meerdere stalen genomen werden, zou het gemiddelde van de onderzochte stalen misschien wel 15,2% bedragen.

Post a new message

Dataset

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time0 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 0 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23583&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]0 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23583&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23583&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time0 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135






Testing Sample Mean with known Variance
Population variance0.012
Sample size27
Null hypothesis (H0)0.152
Confidence interval0.95
Type of IntervalLeft tailRight tail
Two-sided confidence interval at 0.950.1106803311796960.193319668820304
Left one-sided confidence interval at 0.950.117323440808296+inf
Right one-sided confidence interval at 0.95-inf0.186676559191704
more information about confidence interval

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Sample Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
Population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
Sample size & 27 \tabularnewline
Null hypothesis (H0) & 0.152 \tabularnewline
Confidence interval & 0.95 \tabularnewline
Type of Interval & Left tail & Right tail \tabularnewline
Two-sided confidence interval at  0.95 & 0.110680331179696 & 0.193319668820304 \tabularnewline
Left one-sided confidence interval at  0.95 & 0.117323440808296 & +inf \tabularnewline
Right one-sided confidence interval at  0.95 & -inf & 0.186676559191704 \tabularnewline
more information about confidence interval \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23583&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Sample Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Sample size[/C][C]27[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Null hypothesis (H0)[/C][C]0.152[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Confidence interval[/C][C]0.95[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Type of Interval[/C][C]Left tail[/C][C]Right tail[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Two-sided confidence interval at  0.95[/C][C]0.110680331179696[/C][C]0.193319668820304[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Left one-sided confidence interval at  0.95[/C][C]0.117323440808296[/C][C]+inf[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Right one-sided confidence interval at  0.95[/C][C]-inf[/C][C]0.186676559191704[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]more information about confidence interval[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23583&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23583&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Sample Mean with known Variance
Population variance0.012
Sample size27
Null hypothesis (H0)0.152
Confidence interval0.95
Type of IntervalLeft tailRight tail
Two-sided confidence interval at 0.950.1106803311796960.193319668820304
Left one-sided confidence interval at 0.950.117323440808296+inf
Right one-sided confidence interval at 0.95-inf0.186676559191704
more information about confidence interval


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
par1 = 5 ; par2 = 0 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 27 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.95 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
sigma <- sqrt(par1)
sqrtn <- sqrt(par2)
ua <- par3 - abs(qnorm((1-par4)/2))* sigma / sqrtn
ub <- par3 + abs(qnorm((1-par4)/2))* sigma / sqrtn
ua
ub
ul <- par3 - qnorm(par4) * sigma / sqrtn
ul
ur <- par3 + qnorm(par4) * sigma / sqrtn
ur
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Sample Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Sample size',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Null hypothesis (H0)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Confidence interval',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Type of Interval',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Left tail',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Right tail',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,paste('Two-sided confidence interval at ',par4), header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,ua)
a<-table.element(a,ub)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,paste('Left one-sided confidence interval at ',par4), header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,ul)
a<-table.element(a,'+inf')
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,paste('Right one-sided confidence interval at ',par4), header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'-inf')
a<-table.element(a,ur)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a, hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#ex6', 'more information about confidence interval','example'),3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')