FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean1.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Mean with known Variance - Critical Value
Date of computationTue, 11 Nov 2008 06:05:46 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/11/t122640879447loo5i9pjv8yyw.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 08:49:13 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23436, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 08:49:13 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact142

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
-     [Testing Mean with known Variance - Critical Value] [Q1] [2008-11-06 16:26:53] [e1a46c1dcfccb0cb690f79a1a409b517]
F         [Testing Mean with known Variance - Critical Value] [Pork Quality Test Q1] [2008-11-11 13:05:46] [e7b118d7688fea522247297d6fc6c452] [Current]
-           [Testing Mean with known Variance - Critical Value] [] [2008-11-21 18:45:05] [888addc516c3b812dd7be4bd54caa358]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-14 11:29:33 [Ciska Tanghe] [reply] 
Dit kan ook:

In dit voorbeeld kan er zowel een afwijking naar boven als naar beneden zijn van het vetpercentage. Het vetpercentage mag niet te veel of te weinig zijn. Daarm kiezen we voor de two-sided test.
2008-11-18 08:36:15 [Siem Van Opstal] [reply] 
zeer uitgebreide, correcte conclusie
2008-11-21 14:32:29 [Hidde Van Kerckhoven] [reply] 
De student heeft een correcte conclusie geschreven, toch valt op te merken dat hier een 1-zijdige of een 2-zijdige test gebruikt kan worden... 1 zijdig-> als er gefraudeerd wordt, zal dit in een richting gebeuren... 2-zijdig -> er mag niet te veel en niet te weinig vet in het vlees zitten... Een nulhypothese mag hier inderdaad toegepast worden..
2008-11-22 15:58:26 [Bonifer Spillemaeckers] [reply] 
Volgens mij moeten we hiervoor de 1-sided test gebruiken. Deze zal de afwijkingen naar boven toe meten. Enkel de afwijkingen naar boven toe, wat wijst op meer vetpercentage dan contractueel afgesproken, kunnen een economisch voordeel geven aan de leverancier.
2008-11-23 15:00:49 [339a57d8a4d5d113e4804fc423e4a59e] [reply] 
De student gebruikt de juiste software en merkt terecht op dat de critical value groter is dan de sample mean. Er is geen significant verschil en bijgevolg is er dus een toevallige afwijking ten opzichte van het contractueel bepaalde vetgehalte. We dienen dus geen klacht in. De nulhypothese wordt hierbij aanvaard.
2008-11-24 10:29:20 [Lindsay Heyndrickx] [reply] 
Hier heeft de student een goede uitleg gegeven.
Hier moet je ook eens kijken of het tweezijdig is of niet. Dit kan nuttig zijn omdat de afwijking in twee richtingen kan. Is er in het productieproces iets mis? Te weinig vet in het vlees kan ook een probleem zijn. dit komt echter niet zo veel voor.

Post a new message

Dataset

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 2 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23436&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]2 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23436&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23436&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001






Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance0.012
sample mean0.1546
null hypothesis about mean0.15
type I error0.05
critical value (one-tailed)0.184676559191704
confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean)[ 0.113280331179696 , 0.195919668820304 ]
conclusion for one-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion for two-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
sample size & 27 \tabularnewline
population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
sample mean & 0.1546 \tabularnewline
null hypothesis about mean & 0.15 \tabularnewline
type I error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
critical value (one-tailed) & 0.184676559191704 \tabularnewline
confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean) & [ 0.113280331179696 ,  0.195919668820304 ] \tabularnewline
conclusion for one-tailed test \tabularnewline
Do not reject the null hypothesis. \tabularnewline
conclusion for two-tailed test \tabularnewline
Do not reject the null hypothesis \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23436&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample size[/C][C]27[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample mean[/C][C]0.1546[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]null hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.15[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type I error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]critical value (one-tailed)[/C][C]0.184676559191704[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean)[/C][C][ 0.113280331179696 ,  0.195919668820304 ][/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]conclusion for one-tailed test[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Do not reject the null hypothesis.[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]conclusion for two-tailed test[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Do not reject the null hypothesis[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23436&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23436&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance0.012
sample mean0.1546
null hypothesis about mean0.15
type I error0.05
critical value (one-tailed)0.184676559191704
confidence interval (two-tailed)(sample mean)[ 0.113280331179696 , 0.195919668820304 ]
conclusion for one-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion for two-tailed test
Do not reject the null hypothesis


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 0.012 ; par3 = 0.1546 ; par4 = 0.15 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 0.012 ; par3 = 0.1546 ; par4 = 0.15 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
par5<-as.numeric(par5)
c <- 'NA'
csn <- abs(qnorm(par5))
csn2 <- abs(qnorm(par5/2))
if (par3 == par4)
{
conclusion <- 'Error: the null hypothesis and sample mean must not be equal.'
conclusion2 <- conclusion
} else {
cleft <- par3 - csn2 * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
cright <- par3 + csn2 * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
c2 <- paste('[',cleft)
c2 <- paste(c2,', ')
c2 <- paste(c2,cright)
c2 <- paste(c2,']')
if ((par4 < cleft) | (par4 > cright))
{
conclusion2 <- 'Reject the null hypothesis'
} else {
conclusion2 <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis'
}
}
if (par3 > par4)
{
c <- par4 + csn * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
if (par3 < c)
{
conclusion <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis.'
} else {
conclusion <- 'Reject the null hypothesis.'
}
}
if (par3 < par4)
{
c <- par4 - csn * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
if (par3 > c)
{
conclusion <- 'Do not reject the null hypothesis.'
} else {
conclusion <- 'Reject the null hypothesis.'
}
}
c
conclusion
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample size',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'null hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type I error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par5)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#overview','critical value (one-tailed)','about the critical value'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'confidence interval (two-tailed)
(sample mean)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,c2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'conclusion for one-tailed test',2,header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,conclusion,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'conclusion for two-tailed test',2,header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,conclusion2,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')