Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean3.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Mean with known Variance - Type II Error
Date of computationTue, 11 Nov 2008 03:28:52 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/11/t122639938932j3mejc434r74l.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 08:55:40 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23283, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 08:55:40 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact147
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Testing Mean with known Variance - Type II Error] [Pork quality test Q3] [2008-11-11 10:28:52] [821c4b3d195be8e737cf8c9dc649d3cf] [Current]
F         [Testing Mean with known Variance - Type II Error] [] [2008-11-12 14:21:00] [8d2ae74f923b31b35e9e42977c3c4399]
F   P     [Testing Mean with known Variance - Type II Error] [Q3] [2008-11-12 14:21:00] [a0c3f7f6bb6d3d65b8bcf25e6a3c7584]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-20 13:12:09 [Gert-Jan Geudens] [reply
Het antwoord is correct al wil ik nog iets toevoegen. Er is 6% pakkans. We kunnen dus stellen dat de leverancier slechts een beetje 'gefoefeld' heeft zodat de pakkans zeer klein is.
2008-11-23 15:03:18 [Maarten Van Gucht] [reply
Er is inderdaad 94% kans dat we de fout niet ontdekken zoals de student eerder vermeld in zijn antwoord. en kan nog bij vermeld worden dat er dus 6% kans is dat we deze wel ontdekken. De type I fout en de type II fout zijn negatief gecorreleerd : als de ene toeneemt, zal de ander dalen. je kan alleen de type II fout berekenen als je de alternatieve hypothese kent: deze is 0.152. We kunnen deze type II fout berekenen aan de hand van de alternatieve hypothese(0.152)
Er wordt in dit voorbeeld wel gefraudeerd, maar net weinig genoeg om niet gepakt te worden.
Doordat de kans zo groot is dat we de leverancier niet pakken bij fraude, zal de neiging tot fraude groot zijn bij de leverancier.
2008-11-23 17:42:43 [Aurélie Van Impe] [reply
Het antwoord van de student is correct. We moeten naar de type II error kijken, aangezien deze staat voor de kans dat je een schuldige laat lopen. Je kan er nog bijvoegen dat er dus 6% kans is dat de fraude wel ontdekt wordt. De neiging bij de leverancier om te frauderen is dus zeer groot. Waarschijnlijk is er wel gefraudeerd, maar net weinig genoeg, zodanig dat hij niet gepakt kan worden.
2008-11-24 10:07:48 [Lennart Holemans] [reply
Er is inderdaad 94% kans dat ze de fout niet ontdekken.
Door naar de type II error te kijken, kun je weten wat de kans is dat je de schuldige laat lopen. Er wordt gefraudeerd in dit voorbeeld, maar net niet genoeg om gepakt te worden. Dit leidt tot een grote neiging van fraude bij de leverancier.

Post a new message




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23283&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23283&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23283&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24







Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance0.012
sample mean0.1546
null hypothesis about mean0.15
type I error0.05
alternative hypothesis about mean0.152
Type II Error0.93942747750307

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
sample size & 27 \tabularnewline
population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
sample mean & 0.1546 \tabularnewline
null hypothesis about mean & 0.15 \tabularnewline
type I error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
alternative hypothesis about mean & 0.152 \tabularnewline
Type II Error & 0.93942747750307 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23283&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample size[/C][C]27[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample mean[/C][C]0.1546[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]null hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.15[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type I error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]alternative hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.152[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Type II Error[/C][C]0.93942747750307[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23283&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=23283&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Mean with known Variance
sample size27
population variance0.012
sample mean0.1546
null hypothesis about mean0.15
type I error0.05
alternative hypothesis about mean0.152
Type II Error0.93942747750307



Parameters (Session):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 0.012 ; par3 = 0.1546 ; par4 = 0.15 ; par5 = 0.05 ; par6 = 0.152 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 27 ; par2 = 0.012 ; par3 = 0.1546 ; par4 = 0.15 ; par5 = 0.05 ; par6 = 0.152 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
par5<-as.numeric(par5)
par6<-as.numeric(par6)
c <- 'NA'
csn <- abs(qnorm(par5))
if (par3 == par4)
{
conclusion <- 'Error: the null hypothesis and sample mean must not be equal.'
}
if (par3 > par4)
{
c <- par4 + csn * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
}
if (par3 < par4)
{
c <- par4 - csn * sqrt(par2) / sqrt(par1)
}
p <- pnorm((c - par6) / (sqrt(par2/par1)))
p
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample size',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'sample mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'null hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type I error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par5)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'alternative hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par6)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#ex3','Type II Error','example'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,p)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')