FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_pairs.wasp
Title produced by softwareKendall tau Correlation Matrix
Date of computationThu, 06 Nov 2008 08:01:43 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/06/t12259842701e1y3sk60dofhnm.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 07:07:47 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22246, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 07:07:47 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact150

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Kendall tau Correlation Matrix] [Stefan Temmerman] [2008-11-06 15:01:43] [7866e091edc3e3e9f6a037e9d19fcaa2] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-09 13:03:49 [6066575aa30c0611e452e930b1dff53d] [reply] 
Ik vind dat deze vraag zeer goed beantwoord is. Het klopt volgens mij inderdaad dat RCF de beste predictor is voor RNR. Verder zou ik nog vermeld hebben dat enkel de correlaties met een betrouwbaarheid die kleiner is dan 0,05 te vertrouwen zijn. Dit houdt dus in dat enkel de correlaties tussen RNVM en RNR, RNR en RCF te vertrouwen zijn. Verder zou ik ook nog vermeld hebben dat de grafieken de correlaties aangeven en de getallen de betrouwbaarheid van de correlaties.
2008-11-11 10:31:31 [Jonas Scheltjens] [reply] 
De conclusie is helemaal juist, de keuze van de RCF is goed en ook de verwijzing naar het lineaire verband in de grafiek is goed. Het is gepast om te verwijzen naar de kans dat de RCF toch aan toeval te wijten is (1%), maar misschien kan ook nog vermeldt worden dat ook de RNVM(3%) zich onder de grens van 5% bevindt (om betrouwbaar te zijn).
2008-11-11 15:58:25 [Stefan Temmerman] [reply] 
De vraag is goed opgelost. Deze correlaties zijn berekend met de Kendall tau Correlation Plot. Het geeft een mooi en gestructureerd overzicht van alle verbanden van RNVM, RNR, RCF, RLEZ en REV.
De beste predictor voor RNR (rendement), is RCF (cashflow). Het verband tussen deze twee is bijna lineair, zoals af te lezen op de grafiek, en heeft een kans van 0.01 om toevallig voor te komen. Deze kans is heel klein, dus de predictor is het best betrouwbaar.
Ik heb wel niet vermeld dat RVNM een probabiliteit heeft van 0.03 om toevallig voor te komen. Dit is ook betrouwbaar, en bijgevolg ook een goede predictor.
2008-11-12 10:08:36 [Evelyn Gabriel] [reply] 
De student is tot de juiste conclusie gekomen dat de RCF de beste voorspeller is van RCF. De betrouwbaarheid is namelijk groot genoeg wanneer die onder 0,05 ligt.

Post a new message

Dataset

Dataseries X:
Download CSV
Histogram
Boxplots 
4,2	4,8	20,8	0,9	39,6
2,6	-4,2	17,1	0,85	36,1
3	1,6	22,3	0,83	34,4
3,8	5,2	25,1	0,84	33,4
4	9,2	27,7	0,85	34,8
3,5	4,6	24,9	0,83	33,7
4,1	10,6	29,5	0,83	36,3

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132
R Framework error message
The field 'Names of X columns' contains a hard return which cannot be interpreted.
Please, resubmit your request without hard returns in the 'Names of X columns'.

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 2 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132 \tabularnewline
R Framework error message & 
The field 'Names of X columns' contains a hard return which cannot be interpreted.
Please, resubmit your request without hard returns in the 'Names of X columns'.
 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22246&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]2 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Framework error message[/C][C]
The field 'Names of X columns' contains a hard return which cannot be interpreted.
Please, resubmit your request without hard returns in the 'Names of X columns'.
[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22246&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22246&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132
R Framework error message
The field 'Names of X columns' contains a hard return which cannot be interpreted.
Please, resubmit your request without hard returns in the 'Names of X columns'.






Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pairtaup-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )0.7142857142857140.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )0.5238095238095240.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )0.3333333333333330.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )0.809523809523810.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )-0.05292561240249630.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )0.04761904761904761
tau( RCF , RLEZ )-0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )-0.1428571428571430.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )0.3704792868174740.266379923342483

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series \tabularnewline
pair & tau & p-value \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RNR ) & 0.714285714285714 & 0.0301587301587301 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RCF ) & 0.523809523809524 & 0.136111111111111 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RLEZ ) & 0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , REV
 ) & 0.333333333333333 & 0.381349206349206 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RCF ) & 0.80952380952381 & 0.0107142857142857 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RLEZ ) & -0.0529256124024963 & 0.873844698517373 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , REV
 ) & 0.0476190476190476 & 1 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , RLEZ ) & -0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , REV
 ) & -0.142857142857143 & 0.772619047619048 \tabularnewline
tau( RLEZ , REV
 ) & 0.370479286817474 & 0.266379923342483 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22246&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]pair[/C][C]tau[/C][C]p-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RNR )[/C][C]0.714285714285714[/C][C]0.0301587301587301[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RCF )[/C][C]0.523809523809524[/C][C]0.136111111111111[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RLEZ )[/C][C]0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , REV
 )[/C][C]0.333333333333333[/C][C]0.381349206349206[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RCF )[/C][C]0.80952380952381[/C][C]0.0107142857142857[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.0529256124024963[/C][C]0.873844698517373[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , REV
 )[/C][C]0.0476190476190476[/C][C]1[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , REV
 )[/C][C]-0.142857142857143[/C][C]0.772619047619048[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RLEZ , REV
 )[/C][C]0.370479286817474[/C][C]0.266379923342483[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22246&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22246&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pairtaup-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )0.7142857142857140.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )0.5238095238095240.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )0.3333333333333330.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )0.809523809523810.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )-0.05292561240249630.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )0.04761904761904761
tau( RCF , RLEZ )-0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )-0.1428571428571430.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )0.3704792868174740.266379923342483


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
Parameters (R input):
R code (references can be found in the software module):
panel.tau <- function(x, y, digits=2, prefix='', cex.cor)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(0, 1, 0, 1))
rr <- cor.test(x, y, method='kendall')
r <- round(rr$p.value,2)
txt <- format(c(r, 0.123456789), digits=digits)[1]
txt <- paste(prefix, txt, sep='')
if(missing(cex.cor)) cex <- 0.5/strwidth(txt)
text(0.5, 0.5, txt, cex = cex)
}
panel.hist <- function(x, ...)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(usr[1:2], 0, 1.5) )
h <- hist(x, plot = FALSE)
breaks <- h$breaks; nB <- length(breaks)
y <- h$counts; y <- y/max(y)
rect(breaks[-nB], 0, breaks[-1], y, col='grey', ...)
}
bitmap(file='test1.png')
pairs(t(y),diag.panel=panel.hist, upper.panel=panel.smooth, lower.panel=panel.tau, main=main)
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series',3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'pair',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'tau',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value',1,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
n <- length(y[,1])
n
cor.test(y[1,],y[2,],method='kendall')
for (i in 1:(n-1))
{
for (j in (i+1):n)
{
a<-table.row.start(a)
dum <- paste('tau(',dimnames(t(x))[[2]][i])
dum <- paste(dum,',')
dum <- paste(dum,dimnames(t(x))[[2]][j])
dum <- paste(dum,')')
a<-table.element(a,dum,header=TRUE)
r <- cor.test(y[i,],y[j,],method='kendall')
a<-table.element(a,r$estimate)
a<-table.element(a,r$p.value)
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')