FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_pairs.wasp
Title produced by softwareKendall tau Correlation Matrix
Date of computationThu, 06 Nov 2008 07:21:37 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/06/t1225981695wz6ww1yz7w51c99.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 07:12:02 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22213, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 07:12:02 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact157

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Kendall tau Correlation Matrix] [Laura_Reussens_Ke...] [2008-11-06 14:21:37] [c9806d8558b4490616784faa930c3842] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-10 14:12:13 [Jan Van den Keybus] [reply] 
De student geeft een correcte theoretische weergave van 'kendall tau corroleation matrix '. Ook is de conclusie juist. Je kan er misschien nog bij vermelden dat de p-waarde staat voor de betrouwbaarheid.
2008-11-11 10:20:43 [Kevin Vermeiren] [reply] 
Goede theoretische uitleg ivm de Kendall tau correlation, de conclusie mocht echter iets uitgebreider geformuleerd worden. Het klopt dat de RCF de beste schatter is. Dit mede door dat het een lineair en dus relevant verband vertoont. Hier had ook nog een uitspraak over de betrouwbaarheid bij gepast. Het getal 0.01 staat voor deze betrouwbaarheid. Hieruit kunnen we afleiden dat dit de grens van 95 procent betrouwbaarheid bereikt omdat 0.01<0.05. We kunnen nu met zekerheid stellen dat RCF de beste schatter is.
2008-11-11 13:48:45 [Jonas Scheltjens] [reply] 
De student begrijpt duidelijk de Kendall tau correlation plot. Ook wordt keuze van de beste schatter goed uitgelegd met het lineaire verband, echter, de uitleg rond de getallen ontbreekt. Het is namelijk zo dat de RCF (of cashflow) de beste schatter is omdat zowel de RNVM als de RCF onder de grens van 5% ligt (respectievelijk 3% en 1%) en dus is de RCF nog beter: er bestaat namelijk maar 1% kans dat het vertoonde patroon te wijten is aan het toeval en dus is deze schatter erg betrouwbaar.
2008-11-11 13:49:04 [Hundra Smet] [reply] 
de P waarde moet onder 0,05 liggen om toeval uit te sluiten. hier kunnen we dus als vb. geven dat 0,01 betrouwbaar is en hierdoor uitsluiten dat RCF toevallig de beste schatter is voor RNR.
0,01 duidt op een bijna lineair verband.
2008-11-11 13:57:51 [Hundra Smet] [reply] 
de P waarde moet onder 0,05 liggen om toeval uit te sluiten. hier kunnen we dus als vb. geven dat 0,01 betrouwbaar is en hierdoor uitsluiten dat RCF toevallig de beste schatter is voor RNR.
0,01 duidt op een bijna lineair verband.

Post a new message

Dataset

Dataseries X:
Download CSV
Histogram
Boxplots 
4.2	4.8	20.8	0.9	39.6
2.6	-4.2	17.1	0.85	36.1
3	1.6	22.3	0.83	34.4
3.8	5.2	25.1	0.84	33.4
4	9.2	27.7	0.85	34.8
3.5	4.6	24.9	0.83	33.7
4.1	10.6	29.5	0.83	36.3

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22213&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22213&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22213&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135






Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pairtaup-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )0.7142857142857140.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )0.5238095238095240.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )0.3333333333333330.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )0.809523809523810.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )-0.05292561240249630.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )0.04761904761904761
tau( RCF , RLEZ )-0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )-0.1428571428571430.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )0.3704792868174740.266379923342483

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series \tabularnewline
pair & tau & p-value \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RNR ) & 0.714285714285714 & 0.0301587301587301 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RCF ) & 0.523809523809524 & 0.136111111111111 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RLEZ ) & 0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , REV ) & 0.333333333333333 & 0.381349206349206 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RCF ) & 0.80952380952381 & 0.0107142857142857 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RLEZ ) & -0.0529256124024963 & 0.873844698517373 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , REV ) & 0.0476190476190476 & 1 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , RLEZ ) & -0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , REV ) & -0.142857142857143 & 0.772619047619048 \tabularnewline
tau( RLEZ , REV ) & 0.370479286817474 & 0.266379923342483 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22213&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]pair[/C][C]tau[/C][C]p-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RNR )[/C][C]0.714285714285714[/C][C]0.0301587301587301[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RCF )[/C][C]0.523809523809524[/C][C]0.136111111111111[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RLEZ )[/C][C]0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , REV )[/C][C]0.333333333333333[/C][C]0.381349206349206[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RCF )[/C][C]0.80952380952381[/C][C]0.0107142857142857[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.0529256124024963[/C][C]0.873844698517373[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , REV )[/C][C]0.0476190476190476[/C][C]1[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , REV )[/C][C]-0.142857142857143[/C][C]0.772619047619048[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RLEZ , REV )[/C][C]0.370479286817474[/C][C]0.266379923342483[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22213&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22213&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pairtaup-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )0.7142857142857140.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )0.5238095238095240.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )0.3333333333333330.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )0.809523809523810.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )-0.05292561240249630.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )0.04761904761904761
tau( RCF , RLEZ )-0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )-0.1428571428571430.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )0.3704792868174740.266379923342483


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
Parameters (R input):
R code (references can be found in the software module):
panel.tau <- function(x, y, digits=2, prefix='', cex.cor)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(0, 1, 0, 1))
rr <- cor.test(x, y, method='kendall')
r <- round(rr$p.value,2)
txt <- format(c(r, 0.123456789), digits=digits)[1]
txt <- paste(prefix, txt, sep='')
if(missing(cex.cor)) cex <- 0.5/strwidth(txt)
text(0.5, 0.5, txt, cex = cex)
}
panel.hist <- function(x, ...)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(usr[1:2], 0, 1.5) )
h <- hist(x, plot = FALSE)
breaks <- h$breaks; nB <- length(breaks)
y <- h$counts; y <- y/max(y)
rect(breaks[-nB], 0, breaks[-1], y, col='grey', ...)
}
bitmap(file='test1.png')
pairs(t(y),diag.panel=panel.hist, upper.panel=panel.smooth, lower.panel=panel.tau, main=main)
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series',3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'pair',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'tau',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value',1,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
n <- length(y[,1])
n
cor.test(y[1,],y[2,],method='kendall')
for (i in 1:(n-1))
{
for (j in (i+1):n)
{
a<-table.row.start(a)
dum <- paste('tau(',dimnames(t(x))[[2]][i])
dum <- paste(dum,',')
dum <- paste(dum,dimnames(t(x))[[2]][j])
dum <- paste(dum,')')
a<-table.element(a,dum,header=TRUE)
r <- cor.test(y[i,],y[j,],method='kendall')
a<-table.element(a,r$estimate)
a<-table.element(a,r$p.value)
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')