Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_meanplot.wasp
Title produced by softwareMean Plot
Date of computationThu, 06 Nov 2008 04:38:53 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/06/t12259764246m1mgoxavs9avcy.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 06:05:00 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22093, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 06:05:00 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact124
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F     [Mean Plot] [workshop 3] [2007-10-26 12:14:28] [e9ffc5de6f8a7be62f22b142b5b6b1a8]
F R  D    [Mean Plot] [Q2 opdracht 1] [2008-11-06 11:38:53] [bf6edec4523aff783383cb186da03323] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-09 15:30:13 [Vincent Vanden Poel] [reply
Q2: De reproductie van de grafiek is correct maar de argumentatie onvolledig. Je zou kunnen aangeven dat het interessanter is om naar de tweede grafiek te kijken om deze vraag te beantwoorden omdat deze al dan niet significante verschillend aantoont. Ook zou je iets specifieker kunnen zijn en verwijzen naar de significante stijgingen in maand 6 en 10 omdat de notches elkaar niet overlappen.

Q3: De grafiek is correct gereproduceerd en ook je interpretatie is goed. Je had wel nog op het verschil kunnen wijzen tussen individuele vergelijking van de opeenvolgende jaren en de algemene vergelijking. Als je de individuele periodes met elkaar vergelijkt zie je inderdaad dat de notches elkaar hier overlappen en er dus geen sprake is van een significante daling. Wanneer je echter enkel de eerste met de vijfde periode vergelijkt zie je dat deze notches elkaar nog maar net overlappen. Er is hier dus een hoge mate van significantie.

Post a new message
Dataseries X:
109,20
88,60
94,30
98,30
86,40
80,60
104,10
108,20
93,40
71,90
94,10
94,90
96,40
91,10
84,40
86,40
88,00
75,10
109,70
103,00
82,10
68,00
96,40
94,30
90,00
88,00
76,10
82,50
81,40
66,50
97,20
94,10
80,70
70,50
87,80
89,50
99,60
84,20
75,10
92,00
80,80
73,10
99,80
90,00
83,10
72,40
78,80
87,30
91,00
80,10
73,60
86,40
74,50
71,20
92,40
81,50
85,30
69,90
84,20
90,70
100,30




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time3 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 3 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22093&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]3 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22093&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=22093&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time3 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132



Parameters (Session):
par1 = 12 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 12 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1 <- as.numeric(par1)
(n <- length(x))
(np <- floor(n / par1))
arr <- array(NA,dim=c(par1,np+1))
darr <- array(NA,dim=c(par1,np+1))
ari <- array(0,dim=par1)
dx <- diff(x)
j <- 0
for (i in 1:n)
{
j = j + 1
ari[j] = ari[j] + 1
arr[j,ari[j]] <- x[i]
darr[j,ari[j]] <- dx[i]
if (j == par1) j = 0
}
ari
arr
darr
arr.mean <- array(NA,dim=par1)
arr.median <- array(NA,dim=par1)
arr.midrange <- array(NA,dim=par1)
for (j in 1:par1)
{
arr.mean[j] <- mean(arr[j,],na.rm=TRUE)
arr.median[j] <- median(arr[j,],na.rm=TRUE)
arr.midrange[j] <- (quantile(arr[j,],0.75,na.rm=TRUE) + quantile(arr[j,],0.25,na.rm=TRUE)) / 2
}
overall.mean <- mean(x)
overall.median <- median(x)
overall.midrange <- (quantile(x,0.75) + quantile(x,0.25)) / 2
bitmap(file='plot1.png')
plot(arr.mean,type='b',ylab='mean',main='Mean Plot',xlab='Periodic Index')
mtext(paste('#blocks = ',np))
abline(overall.mean,0)
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot2.png')
plot(arr.median,type='b',ylab='median',main='Median Plot',xlab='Periodic Index')
mtext(paste('#blocks = ',np))
abline(overall.median,0)
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot3.png')
plot(arr.midrange,type='b',ylab='midrange',main='Midrange Plot',xlab='Periodic Index')
mtext(paste('#blocks = ',np))
abline(overall.midrange,0)
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot4.png')
z <- data.frame(t(arr))
names(z) <- c(1:par1)
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',xlab='Periodic Index',ylab='Value',main='Notched Box Plots - Periodic Subseries'))
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot4b.png')
z <- data.frame(t(darr))
names(z) <- c(1:par1)
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',xlab='Periodic Index',ylab='Value',main='Notched Box Plots - Differenced Periodic Subseries'))
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot5.png')
z <- data.frame(arr)
names(z) <- c(1:np)
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',xlab='Block Index',ylab='Value',main='Notched Box Plots - Sequential Blocks'))
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot6.png')
z <- data.frame(cbind(arr.mean,arr.median,arr.midrange))
names(z) <- list('mean','median','midrange')
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',ylab='Overall Central Tendency',main='Notched Box Plots'))
dev.off()