Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_notchedbox1.wasp
Title produced by softwareNotched Boxplots
Date of computationMon, 03 Nov 2008 14:55:16 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/03/t1225749392bjg267lzozef14t.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 12:36:58 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 12:36:58 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact168
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F     [Notched Boxplots] [workshop 3] [2007-10-26 13:31:48] [e9ffc5de6f8a7be62f22b142b5b6b1a8]
F    D  [Notched Boxplots] [Q1: Box plot] [2008-10-30 12:35:42] [1ce0d16c8f4225c977b42c8fa93bc163]
F           [Notched Boxplots] [Q1] [2008-11-03 21:55:16] [d96f761aa3e94002e7c05c3c847d2c79] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-06 13:31:01 [Joren Nuyts] [reply
Q1:
Student heeft zich vooral op het visuele gebaseerd. Misschien had hier vermeld moeten staan op basis van wat de student zich baseert om te zeggen dat de mediaan van klerenproductie lager ligt dan de mediaan van totale productie.
Door de notches te gaan vergelijken zien we duidelijk dat indien we de lower en upper bound doortrekken van beide notches, de notch van klerenproductie niet grenst aan de lower bound van totale productie. Hieruit kunnen we concluderen dat er een significant verschil is tussen beide en dat het niet te wijten is aan toevalligheid.
De eindconclusie die de student heeft gegeven is juist.


2008-11-08 17:36:57 [Niels Herremans] [reply
Als we kijken naar de inkepingen (die het betrouwbaarheidsinterval voorstellen) zien we dat de notched boxplots van de totale productie en die van de kleding productie niet in elkaar betrouwbaarheidsinterval liggen dus kan men spreken van significant lager. Het is niet te wijten aan toeval.
2008-11-10 10:30:48 [Servaes Hereman] [reply
2008-11-10 10:38:30 [339a57d8a4d5d113e4804fc423e4a59e] [reply
De student heeft hier de juiste software gebruikt, namelijk de notched boxplot. De student geeft aan dat de mediaan van de kledij kleiner is dan die van de totale productie. Dit is correct en kan men aantonen door de notches op de grafiek door te trekken. Zo verkrijgt men het betrouwbaarheidsinterval, dat in dit geval 95% bedraagt, waartussen de mediaan kan schommelen. Op de grafiek kan men dus duidelijk zien dat de upper bound van de notches van de kledingproductie lager ligt dan de lower bound van de notches van de industriële productie. Men kan dus stellen dat de mediaan van de kledingproductie SIGNIFICANT lager ligt dan de mediaan van de industriële productie. Dit is dus niet te wijten aan toeval.
2008-11-11 13:27:43 [Thomas Baken] [reply
De redenering van de student is juist. De student kon er nog bijvermelden dat de mediaan van kledingproductie significant lager ligt dan de mediaan van totale productie.

Post a new message
Dataseries X:
110,40	109,20
96,40	88,60
101,90	94,30
106,20	98,30
81,00	86,40
94,70	80,60
101,00	104,10
109,40	108,20
102,30	93,40
90,70	71,90
96,20	94,10
96,10	94,90
106,00	96,40
103,10	91,10
102,00	84,40
104,70	86,40
86,00	88,00
92,10	75,10
106,90	109,70
112,60	103,00
101,70	82,10
92,00	68,00
97,40	96,40
97,00	94,30
105,40	90,00
102,70	88,00
98,10	76,10
104,50	82,50
87,40	81,40
89,90	66,50
109,80	97,20
111,70	94,10
98,60	80,70
96,90	70,50
95,10	87,80
97,00	89,50
112,70	99,60
102,90	84,20
97,40	75,10
111,40	92,00
87,40	80,80
96,80	73,10
114,10	99,80
110,30	90,00
103,90	83,10
101,60	72,40
94,60	78,80
95,90	87,30
104,70	91,00
102,80	80,10
98,10	73,60
113,90	86,40
80,90	74,50
95,70	71,20
113,20	92,40
105,90	81,50
108,80	85,30
102,30	69,90
99,00	84,20
100,70	90,70
115,50	100,30




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 2 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]2 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001







Boxplot statistics
Variablelower whiskerlower hingemedianupper hingeupper whisker
X18696.2101.7106115.5
X266.580.687.394.1109.7

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Boxplot statistics \tabularnewline
Variable & lower whisker & lower hinge & median & upper hinge & upper whisker \tabularnewline
X1 & 86 & 96.2 & 101.7 & 106 & 115.5 \tabularnewline
X2 & 66.5 & 80.6 & 87.3 & 94.1 & 109.7 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Boxplot statistics[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Variable[/C][C]lower whisker[/C][C]lower hinge[/C][C]median[/C][C]upper hinge[/C][C]upper whisker[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]X1[/C][C]86[/C][C]96.2[/C][C]101.7[/C][C]106[/C][C]115.5[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]X2[/C][C]66.5[/C][C]80.6[/C][C]87.3[/C][C]94.1[/C][C]109.7[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Boxplot statistics
Variablelower whiskerlower hingemedianupper hingeupper whisker
X18696.2101.7106115.5
X266.580.687.394.1109.7







Boxplot Notches
Variablelower boundmedianupper bound
X199.717476951119101.7103.682523048881
X284.568973351031387.390.0310266489687

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Boxplot Notches \tabularnewline
Variable & lower bound & median & upper bound \tabularnewline
X1 & 99.717476951119 & 101.7 & 103.682523048881 \tabularnewline
X2 & 84.5689733510313 & 87.3 & 90.0310266489687 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338&T=2

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Boxplot Notches[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Variable[/C][C]lower bound[/C][C]median[/C][C]upper bound[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]X1[/C][C]99.717476951119[/C][C]101.7[/C][C]103.682523048881[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]X2[/C][C]84.5689733510313[/C][C]87.3[/C][C]90.0310266489687[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338&T=2

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21338&T=2

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Boxplot Notches
Variablelower boundmedianupper bound
X199.717476951119101.7103.682523048881
X284.568973351031387.390.0310266489687



Parameters (Session):
par1 = grey ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = grey ; par2 = ; par3 = ; par4 = ; par5 = ; par6 = ; par7 = ; par8 = ; par9 = ; par10 = ; par11 = ; par12 = ; par13 = ; par14 = ; par15 = ; par16 = ; par17 = ; par18 = ; par19 = ; par20 = ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
z <- as.data.frame(t(y))
bitmap(file='test1.png')
(r<-boxplot(z ,xlab=xlab,ylab=ylab,main=main,notch=TRUE,col=par1))
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('overview.htm','Boxplot statistics','Boxplot overview'),6,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Variable',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('lower_whisker.htm','lower whisker','definition of lower whisker'),1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('lower_hinge.htm','lower hinge','definition of lower hinge'),1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('central_tendency.htm','median','definitions about measures of central tendency'),1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('upper_hinge.htm','upper hinge','definition of upper hinge'),1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('upper_whisker.htm','upper whisker','definition of upper whisker'),1,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
for (i in 1:length(y[,1]))
{
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,dimnames(t(x))[[2]][i],1,TRUE)
for (j in 1:5)
{
a<-table.element(a,r$stats[j,i])
}
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Boxplot Notches',4,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Variable',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'lower bound',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'median',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'upper bound',1,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
for (i in 1:length(y[,1]))
{
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,dimnames(t(x))[[2]][i],1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,r$conf[1,i])
a<-table.element(a,r$stats[3,i])
a<-table.element(a,r$conf[2,i])
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable1.tab')