Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_meanplot.wasp
Title produced by softwareMean Plot
Date of computationMon, 03 Nov 2008 14:06:18 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/03/t1225746395rdunavvifpb0usj.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 08:51:38 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21285, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 08:51:38 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact157
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F     [Mean Plot] [workshop 3] [2007-10-26 12:14:28] [e9ffc5de6f8a7be62f22b142b5b6b1a8]
F   PD  [Mean Plot] [mean plot Q 3] [2008-10-30 11:54:43] [ed2ba3b6182103c15c0ab511ae4e6284]
F           [Mean Plot] [] [2008-11-03 21:06:18] [c0a347e3519123f7eef62b705326dad9] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-10 14:26:28 [66991d38d6a4b2d9fe97b6c889f3689c] [reply
in de oplossing wordt vermeld dat je het aantal blocks op 5 moet zetten. toch heb je een oplossing geblogd met 12 blocks...

de daling waar jij overspreeks na jaar vier kunnen we aantonen omdat de mediaan van jaar 5 opmerkelijk lager ligt dan die van jaar 1 én omdat de betrouwbaarheids intervallen elkaar dan niet meer overlappen.
bij alle andere jaren is dit wel het geval waardoor we niet kunnen zeggen dat er een significante daling is omdat er een kans bestaat dat de medianen samenvallen.(ze kunnen namelijk verschuiven binnen het betrouwbaarheidsinterval)

de algemene conclusie bij deze vraag luidt als volgt:
laten we jaar 5 buiten beschouwing, dan is de daling niet significant.
wanneer we jaar 5 wel beschouwen, besluiten we dat de daling twijfelachtig is. ze is er wel maar niet duidelijk genoeg.

Post a new message
Dataseries X:
109.20
88.60
94.30
98.30
86.40
80.60
104.10
108.20
93.40
71.90
94.10
94.90
96.40
91.10
84.40
86.40
88.00
75.10
109.70
103.00
82.10
68.00
96.40
94.30
90.00
88.00
76.10
82.50
81.40
66.50
97.20
94.10
80.70
70.50
87.80
89.50
99.60
84.20
75.10
92.00
80.80
73.10
99.80
90.00
83.10
72.40
78.80
87.30
91.00
80.10
73.60
86.40
74.50
71.20
92.40
81.50
85.30
69.90
84.20
90.70
100.30




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time4 seconds
R Server'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 4 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21285&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]4 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21285&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21285&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time4 seconds
R Server'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001



Parameters (Session):
par1 = 5 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 5 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1 <- as.numeric(par1)
(n <- length(x))
(np <- floor(n / par1))
arr <- array(NA,dim=c(par1,np+1))
ari <- array(0,dim=par1)
j <- 0
for (i in 1:n)
{
j = j + 1
ari[j] = ari[j] + 1
arr[j,ari[j]] <- x[i]
if (j == par1) j = 0
}
ari
arr
arr.mean <- array(NA,dim=par1)
arr.median <- array(NA,dim=par1)
arr.midrange <- array(NA,dim=par1)
for (j in 1:par1)
{
arr.mean[j] <- mean(arr[j,],na.rm=TRUE)
arr.median[j] <- median(arr[j,],na.rm=TRUE)
arr.midrange[j] <- (quantile(arr[j,],0.75,na.rm=TRUE) + quantile(arr[j,],0.25,na.rm=TRUE)) / 2
}
overall.mean <- mean(x)
overall.median <- median(x)
overall.midrange <- (quantile(x,0.75) + quantile(x,0.25)) / 2
bitmap(file='plot1.png')
plot(arr.mean,type='b',ylab='mean',main='Mean Plot',xlab='Periodic Index')
mtext(paste('#blocks = ',np))
abline(overall.mean,0)
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot2.png')
plot(arr.median,type='b',ylab='median',main='Median Plot',xlab='Periodic Index')
mtext(paste('#blocks = ',np))
abline(overall.median,0)
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot3.png')
plot(arr.midrange,type='b',ylab='midrange',main='Midrange Plot',xlab='Periodic Index')
mtext(paste('#blocks = ',np))
abline(overall.midrange,0)
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot4.png')
z <- data.frame(t(arr))
names(z) <- c(1:par1)
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',xlab='Periodic Index',ylab='Value',main='Notched Box Plots - Periodic Subseries'))
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot5.png')
z <- data.frame(arr)
names(z) <- c(1:np)
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',xlab='Block Index',ylab='Value',main='Notched Box Plots - Sequential Blocks'))
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot6.png')
z <- data.frame(cbind(arr.mean,arr.median,arr.midrange))
names(z) <- list('mean','median','midrange')
(boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,col='grey',ylab='Overall Central Tendency',main='Notched Box Plots'))
dev.off()