Repository of Reproducible Computations

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author

*The author of this computation has been verified*

R Software Module

rwasp_pairs.wasp

Title produced by software

Kendall tau Correlation Matrix

Date of computation

Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:59:16 -0700

Cite this page as follows

Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/03/t1225742383nbp8hc7auwvzx64.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 10:48:11 +0000

Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21131, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 10:48:11 +0000

QR Codes:

Paste this QR Code to cite your computation.

Original text written by user:

IsPrivate?

No (this computation is public)

User-defined keywords

Estimated Impact

149

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)

F     [Notched Boxplots] [workshop 3] [2007-10-26 13:31:48] [e9ffc5de6f8a7be62f22b142b5b6b1a8]
F RMPD    [Kendall tau Correlation Matrix] [Deel 2 Q1] [2008-11-03 19:59:16] [db9a5fd0f9c3e1245d8075d8bb09236d] [Current]
-           [Kendall tau Correlation Matrix] [] [2008-11-10 12:13:20] [888addc516c3b812dd7be4bd54caa358] 

Feedback Forum

2008-11-06 16:26:21 [Stijn Van de Velde] [reply] 
Via de Kendall tau Correlation Matrix vinden we alle mogelijke correlaties terug. 
Wanneer we zoeken naar de beste predictor, moeten we zoeken naar de laagste P-waarde. Deze stelt de kans dat de correlatie te wijten is aan toeval voor. 
We zien dat de p-waarde bij de RCF het laagste is (0,0107) en kunnnen dus stellen dat de RCF de beste predictor is voor de RNR. 
We kunnen dus stellen dat de kans slechts 1,07% is dat de correlatie tussen deze 2 reeksen aan toeval te wijten is. De correlatie is hier overigens 81% (kijken naar 'tau'). 
2008-11-10 22:50:06 [Ilknur Günes] [reply] 
De cijfers geven de graad van toeval weer: hoe groter de cijfer, hoe meer toeval. Maw we moeten naar de kleinste cijfer kijken. In dit geval kan het 0,01 en 0,03 zijn: RCF en RNVM. Want onder 0,05 kunnen we van correlatie spreken. 0,01 is kleiner, dus RCF is de beste predictor voor RNR 
 
Grafiek is correct, maar je geeft geen uitleg in je document! Daarom kan ik je maar de helft van de punten geven.
2008-11-11 10:15:07 [Dries Van Gheluwe] [reply] 
We zien dat je Q1 hier opgelost hebt met het goede model maar er staat geen uitleg bij in je werk. Het is eigenlijk heel eenvoudig om deze oefening op te lossen. Hoe kleiner het getal in het correlation plot, hoe beter de correlatie. Je kan ook kijken naar de correlatietabel erboven (op die manier heb ik het opgelost)

Post a new message

Dataseries X:

Download CSV

Histogram

Boxplots

4.2	4.8	20.8	0.9	39.6
2.6	-4.20	17.10	0.85	36.10
3	1.60	22.30	0.83	34.40
3.8	5.20	25.10	0.84	33.4
4	9.20	27.70	0.85	34.8
3.5	4.60	24.90	0.83	33.70
4.1	10.6	29.5	0.83	36.3

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Input	view raw input (R code)
Raw Output	view raw output of R engine
Computing time	1 seconds
R Server	'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21131&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21131&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21131&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Input	view raw input (R code)
Raw Output	view raw output of R engine
Computing time	1 seconds
R Server	'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132

Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pair	tau	p-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )	0.714285714285714	0.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )	0.523809523809524	0.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )	0.264628062012482	0.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )	0.333333333333333	0.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )	0.80952380952381	0.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )	-0.0529256124024963	0.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )	0.0476190476190476	1
tau( RCF , RLEZ )	-0.264628062012482	0.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )	-0.142857142857143	0.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )	0.370479286817474	0.266379923342483

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series \tabularnewline
pair & tau & p-value \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RNR ) & 0.714285714285714 & 0.0301587301587301 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RCF ) & 0.523809523809524 & 0.136111111111111 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RLEZ ) & 0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , REV ) & 0.333333333333333 & 0.381349206349206 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RCF ) & 0.80952380952381 & 0.0107142857142857 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RLEZ ) & -0.0529256124024963 & 0.873844698517373 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , REV ) & 0.0476190476190476 & 1 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , RLEZ ) & -0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , REV ) & -0.142857142857143 & 0.772619047619048 \tabularnewline
tau( RLEZ , REV ) & 0.370479286817474 & 0.266379923342483 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21131&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]pair[/C][C]tau[/C][C]p-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RNR )[/C][C]0.714285714285714[/C][C]0.0301587301587301[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RCF )[/C][C]0.523809523809524[/C][C]0.136111111111111[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RLEZ )[/C][C]0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , REV )[/C][C]0.333333333333333[/C][C]0.381349206349206[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RCF )[/C][C]0.80952380952381[/C][C]0.0107142857142857[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.0529256124024963[/C][C]0.873844698517373[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , REV )[/C][C]0.0476190476190476[/C][C]1[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , REV )[/C][C]-0.142857142857143[/C][C]0.772619047619048[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RLEZ , REV )[/C][C]0.370479286817474[/C][C]0.266379923342483[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21131&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21131&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pair	tau	p-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )	0.714285714285714	0.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )	0.523809523809524	0.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )	0.264628062012482	0.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )	0.333333333333333	0.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )	0.80952380952381	0.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )	-0.0529256124024963	0.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )	0.0476190476190476	1
tau( RCF , RLEZ )	-0.264628062012482	0.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )	-0.142857142857143	0.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )	0.370479286817474	0.266379923342483

Figure 1

PNG link

Postscript link

PDF link

Parameters (Session):

par1 = 12 ;

Parameters (R input):

R code (references can be found in the software module):

panel.tau <- function(x, y, digits=2, prefix='', cex.cor)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(0, 1, 0, 1))
rr <- cor.test(x, y, method='kendall')
r <- round(rr$p.value,2)
txt <- format(c(r, 0.123456789), digits=digits)[1]
txt <- paste(prefix, txt, sep='')
if(missing(cex.cor)) cex <- 0.5/strwidth(txt)
text(0.5, 0.5, txt, cex = cex)
}
panel.hist <- function(x, ...)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(usr[1:2], 0, 1.5) )
h <- hist(x, plot = FALSE)
breaks <- h$breaks; nB <- length(breaks)
y <- h$counts; y <- y/max(y)
rect(breaks[-nB], 0, breaks[-1], y, col='grey', ...)
}
bitmap(file='test1.png')
pairs(t(y),diag.panel=panel.hist, upper.panel=panel.smooth, lower.panel=panel.tau, main=main)
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series',3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'pair',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'tau',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value',1,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
n <- length(y[,1])
n
cor.test(y[1,],y[2,],method='kendall')
for (i in 1:(n-1))
{
for (j in (i+1):n)
{
a<-table.row.start(a)
dum <- paste('tau(',dimnames(t(x))[[2]][i])
dum <- paste(dum,',')
dum <- paste(dum,dimnames(t(x))[[2]][j])
dum <- paste(dum,')')
a<-table.element(a,dum,header=TRUE)
r <- cor.test(y[i,],y[j,],method='kendall')
a<-table.element(a,r$estimate)
a<-table.element(a,r$p.value)
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')

Free Statistics

Description of Statistical Computation

Tree of Dependent Computations

Dataset

Tables (Output of Computation)

Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code