Repository of Reproducible Computations

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author

*The author of this computation has been verified*

R Software Module

rwasp_pairs.wasp

Title produced by software

Kendall tau Correlation Matrix

Date of computation

Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:23:32 -0700

Cite this page as follows

Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/03/t12257080646aqdqgzuux9mucm.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 09:19:49 +0000

Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20792, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 09:19:49 +0000

QR Codes:

Paste this QR Code to cite your computation.

Original text written by user:

IsPrivate?

No (this computation is public)

User-defined keywords

Estimated Impact

168

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)

F       [Kendall tau Correlation Matrix] [] [2008-11-03 10:23:32] [07b7cf1321bc38017c2c7efcf91ca696] [Current]

Feedback Forum

2008-11-05 16:07:49 [Veerle Jackers] [reply] 
Heel goed.
2008-11-10 22:10:17 [Chi-Kwong Man] [reply] 
Correct, hier kan men nog een klein puntje aan toevoegen dat de getallen onder de diagonaal duiden op een betrouwbaarheid van de correlatiecoëfficient. Hoe kleiner het getal des te beter. Cashflow is dus de beste predictor.
2008-11-11 14:31:31 [Jeroen Michel] [reply] 
Je geeft een mooie en uitgebreide analyse weer, zeer knap! Je stelt alles grafisch zeer mooi voor. Zoals vorige student zegt is het misschien aan te raden te vermelden dat de cijfers onder het diagonaal wijzen op de 'toeval' van de correlatiecoëfficient. 
 
De cashflow is inderdaad de beste predictor.
2008-11-11 17:02:15 [Bart Haemels] [reply] 
Ik heb niets gezegd over de p-value. Deze is ook enorm laag nl. 0.01 dit wil dus zeggen dat de correlatie tussen RNR en RCF zeer betrouwbaar is. Want hoe hoger, hoe onbetrouwbaarder. 
2008-11-11 20:47:47 [Kristof Augustyns] [reply] 
De assen zijn goed verwisseld zodat variabelen goed kwamen te staan: 
Observaties op verticale as en de variabelen op horizontale as. 
De correlatie van 80,95% is volledig juist tussen RNR & RCF. 
Op de grafiek van de Matrix zie je dit het beste. 
Hoe rechter de lijn loopt, hoe beter het is --> mooi positieve correlatie. 
Minder als 0,05 is goed (hoe kleiner, hoe beter). 
0,01 is dus goed. 
=> Cashflow is inderdaad de beste predictor 
 
 

Post a new message

Dataseries X:

Download CSV

Histogram

Boxplots

4,2	4,8	20,8	0,9	39,6
2,6	-4,2	17,1	0,85	36,1
3	1,6	22,3	0,83	34,4
3,8	5,2	25,1	0,84	33,4
4	9,2	27,7	0,85	34,8
3,5	4,6	24,9	0,83	33,7
4,1	10,6	29,5	0,83	36,3

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Input	view raw input (R code)
Raw Output	view raw output of R engine
Computing time	1 seconds
R Server	'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20792&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20792&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20792&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Input	view raw input (R code)
Raw Output	view raw output of R engine
Computing time	1 seconds
R Server	'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132

Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pair	tau	p-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )	0.714285714285714	0.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )	0.523809523809524	0.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )	0.264628062012482	0.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )	0.333333333333333	0.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )	0.80952380952381	0.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )	-0.0529256124024963	0.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )	0.0476190476190476	1
tau( RCF , RLEZ )	-0.264628062012482	0.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )	-0.142857142857143	0.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )	0.370479286817474	0.266379923342483

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series \tabularnewline
pair & tau & p-value \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RNR ) & 0.714285714285714 & 0.0301587301587301 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RCF ) & 0.523809523809524 & 0.136111111111111 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RLEZ ) & 0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , REV ) & 0.333333333333333 & 0.381349206349206 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RCF ) & 0.80952380952381 & 0.0107142857142857 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RLEZ ) & -0.0529256124024963 & 0.873844698517373 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , REV ) & 0.0476190476190476 & 1 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , RLEZ ) & -0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , REV ) & -0.142857142857143 & 0.772619047619048 \tabularnewline
tau( RLEZ , REV ) & 0.370479286817474 & 0.266379923342483 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20792&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]pair[/C][C]tau[/C][C]p-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RNR )[/C][C]0.714285714285714[/C][C]0.0301587301587301[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RCF )[/C][C]0.523809523809524[/C][C]0.136111111111111[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RLEZ )[/C][C]0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , REV )[/C][C]0.333333333333333[/C][C]0.381349206349206[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RCF )[/C][C]0.80952380952381[/C][C]0.0107142857142857[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.0529256124024963[/C][C]0.873844698517373[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , REV )[/C][C]0.0476190476190476[/C][C]1[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , REV )[/C][C]-0.142857142857143[/C][C]0.772619047619048[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RLEZ , REV )[/C][C]0.370479286817474[/C][C]0.266379923342483[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20792&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20792&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pair	tau	p-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )	0.714285714285714	0.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )	0.523809523809524	0.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )	0.264628062012482	0.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )	0.333333333333333	0.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )	0.80952380952381	0.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )	-0.0529256124024963	0.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )	0.0476190476190476	1
tau( RCF , RLEZ )	-0.264628062012482	0.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )	-0.142857142857143	0.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )	0.370479286817474	0.266379923342483

Figure 1

PNG link

Postscript link

PDF link

Parameters (Session):

Parameters (R input):

R code (references can be found in the software module):

panel.tau <- function(x, y, digits=2, prefix='', cex.cor)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(0, 1, 0, 1))
rr <- cor.test(x, y, method='kendall')
r <- round(rr$p.value,2)
txt <- format(c(r, 0.123456789), digits=digits)[1]
txt <- paste(prefix, txt, sep='')
if(missing(cex.cor)) cex <- 0.5/strwidth(txt)
text(0.5, 0.5, txt, cex = cex)
}
panel.hist <- function(x, ...)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(usr[1:2], 0, 1.5) )
h <- hist(x, plot = FALSE)
breaks <- h$breaks; nB <- length(breaks)
y <- h$counts; y <- y/max(y)
rect(breaks[-nB], 0, breaks[-1], y, col='grey', ...)
}
bitmap(file='test1.png')
pairs(t(y),diag.panel=panel.hist, upper.panel=panel.smooth, lower.panel=panel.tau, main=main)
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series',3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'pair',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'tau',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value',1,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
n <- length(y[,1])
n
cor.test(y[1,],y[2,],method='kendall')
for (i in 1:(n-1))
{
for (j in (i+1):n)
{
a<-table.row.start(a)
dum <- paste('tau(',dimnames(t(x))[[2]][i])
dum <- paste(dum,',')
dum <- paste(dum,dimnames(t(x))[[2]][j])
dum <- paste(dum,')')
a<-table.element(a,dum,header=TRUE)
r <- cor.test(y[i,],y[j,],method='kendall')
a<-table.element(a,r$estimate)
a<-table.element(a,r$p.value)
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')

Free Statistics

Description of Statistical Computation

Tree of Dependent Computations

Dataset

Tables (Output of Computation)

Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code