FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_pairs.wasp
Title produced by softwareKendall tau Correlation Matrix
Date of computationMon, 03 Nov 2008 02:56:05 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/03/t1225706212pzh6w9duceiv00s.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 12:37:50 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20780, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 12:37:50 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact222

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Kendall tau Correlation Matrix] [q1 master thesis] [2008-11-03 09:56:05] [b4fc5040f26b33db57f84cfb8d1d2b82] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-08 19:08:36 [Jan Van Riet] [reply] 
Je antwoord is juist, maar niet alleen de correlatiewaarde is tussen deze 2 variabelen het hoogst, ook is de betrouwbaarheid van de correlatiecoefficient hier het hoogst. Dit kan je aflezen aan de linkerkant van de diagonaal (met de verdeling erop) op de kendal-tau plot. Deze waarde is tussen RNR en RCF het laagst (0,01), dus dit valt niet aan het toeval toe te wijzen. Dit wordt bevestigd door de vrij rechtlijnige correlatielijn op de scatterplot rechtsboven de verdeling-lijn.
2008-11-10 13:33:15 [Gregory Van Overmeiren] [reply] 
De getallen die we zien zeggen niet wat de correlatie is, deze zeggen wel de betrouwbaarheid van uw correlatie! Hoe hoger dit getal, hoe meer toevallig ik iets gevonden heb. Dus maw hoe kleiner het getal, hoe beter! => Moet eigenlijk onder de 0.05 liggen; dan hebben we een correlatie.

We merken op dat de laagste waarde inderdaad bij 0.01 ligt en dit dus een mooie positieve correlatie is. Maar ook bij de waarde 0.03 is er sprake van een correlatie die niet aan het toeval toe te schrijven is !
2008-11-11 12:59:38 [Sanne Kerckhofs] [reply] 
REV is inderdaad de meest betrouwbare variabele om een voorspelling te maken over RNR. Hoe kleiner de waarde, hoe groter de betrouwbaarheid. De laagste p-waarde geeft dus de hoogste betrouwbaarheid van de correlatie.
2008-11-11 13:13:37 [Sanne Kerckhofs] [reply] 
Kleine correctie van vorige feedback: hoe kleiner de p-waarde, hoe groter de betrouwbaarheid

Post a new message

Dataset

Dataseries X:
Download CSV
Histogram
Boxplots 
4,2	4,8	20,8	0,9	39,6
2,6	-4,2	17,1	0,85	36,1
3	1,6	22,3	0,83	34,4
3,8	5,2	25,1	0,84	33,4
4	9,2	27,7	0,85	34,8
3,5	4,6	24,9	0,83	33,7
4,1	10,6	29,5	0,83	36,3

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 2 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20780&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]2 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20780&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20780&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time2 seconds
R Server'Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher' @ 193.190.124.24






Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pairtaup-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )0.7142857142857140.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )0.5238095238095240.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )0.3333333333333330.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )0.809523809523810.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )-0.05292561240249630.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )0.04761904761904761
tau( RCF , RLEZ )-0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )-0.1428571428571430.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )0.3704792868174740.266379923342483

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series \tabularnewline
pair & tau & p-value \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RNR ) & 0.714285714285714 & 0.0301587301587301 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RCF ) & 0.523809523809524 & 0.136111111111111 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , RLEZ ) & 0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RNVM , REV ) & 0.333333333333333 & 0.381349206349206 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RCF ) & 0.80952380952381 & 0.0107142857142857 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , RLEZ ) & -0.0529256124024963 & 0.873844698517373 \tabularnewline
tau( RNR , REV ) & 0.0476190476190476 & 1 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , RLEZ ) & -0.264628062012482 & 0.427262856745706 \tabularnewline
tau( RCF , REV ) & -0.142857142857143 & 0.772619047619048 \tabularnewline
tau( RLEZ , REV ) & 0.370479286817474 & 0.266379923342483 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20780&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]pair[/C][C]tau[/C][C]p-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RNR )[/C][C]0.714285714285714[/C][C]0.0301587301587301[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RCF )[/C][C]0.523809523809524[/C][C]0.136111111111111[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , RLEZ )[/C][C]0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNVM , REV )[/C][C]0.333333333333333[/C][C]0.381349206349206[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RCF )[/C][C]0.80952380952381[/C][C]0.0107142857142857[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.0529256124024963[/C][C]0.873844698517373[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RNR , REV )[/C][C]0.0476190476190476[/C][C]1[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , RLEZ )[/C][C]-0.264628062012482[/C][C]0.427262856745706[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RCF , REV )[/C][C]-0.142857142857143[/C][C]0.772619047619048[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]tau( RLEZ , REV )[/C][C]0.370479286817474[/C][C]0.266379923342483[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20780&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20780&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series
pairtaup-value
tau( RNVM , RNR )0.7142857142857140.0301587301587301
tau( RNVM , RCF )0.5238095238095240.136111111111111
tau( RNVM , RLEZ )0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RNVM , REV )0.3333333333333330.381349206349206
tau( RNR , RCF )0.809523809523810.0107142857142857
tau( RNR , RLEZ )-0.05292561240249630.873844698517373
tau( RNR , REV )0.04761904761904761
tau( RCF , RLEZ )-0.2646280620124820.427262856745706
tau( RCF , REV )-0.1428571428571430.772619047619048
tau( RLEZ , REV )0.3704792868174740.266379923342483


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
Parameters (R input):
R code (references can be found in the software module):
panel.tau <- function(x, y, digits=2, prefix='', cex.cor)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(0, 1, 0, 1))
rr <- cor.test(x, y, method='kendall')
r <- round(rr$p.value,2)
txt <- format(c(r, 0.123456789), digits=digits)[1]
txt <- paste(prefix, txt, sep='')
if(missing(cex.cor)) cex <- 0.5/strwidth(txt)
text(0.5, 0.5, txt, cex = cex)
}
panel.hist <- function(x, ...)
{
usr <- par('usr'); on.exit(par(usr))
par(usr = c(usr[1:2], 0, 1.5) )
h <- hist(x, plot = FALSE)
breaks <- h$breaks; nB <- length(breaks)
y <- h$counts; y <- y/max(y)
rect(breaks[-nB], 0, breaks[-1], y, col='grey', ...)
}
bitmap(file='test1.png')
pairs(t(y),diag.panel=panel.hist, upper.panel=panel.smooth, lower.panel=panel.tau, main=main)
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Kendall tau rank correlations for all pairs of data series',3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'pair',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'tau',1,TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value',1,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
n <- length(y[,1])
n
cor.test(y[1,],y[2,],method='kendall')
for (i in 1:(n-1))
{
for (j in (i+1):n)
{
a<-table.row.start(a)
dum <- paste('tau(',dimnames(t(x))[[2]][i])
dum <- paste(dum,',')
dum <- paste(dum,dimnames(t(x))[[2]][j])
dum <- paste(dum,')')
a<-table.element(a,dum,header=TRUE)
r <- cor.test(y[i,],y[j,],method='kendall')
a<-table.element(a,r$estimate)
a<-table.element(a,r$p.value)
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')